RTX 5090 vs RTX 3090 for Local LLMs
Data as of 2026-10-07 (sourced runs); prices are the 2026-09-28 snapshot from our weekly snapshot. Prices move weekly — treat dollar figures as a snapshot, not a promise.
TL;DR
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Best value card | Used RTX 3090 24GB (~$1,300, 2026-09-28) — $54/GB of VRAM |
| Best new flagship | RTX 5090 32GB (~$9,000 street, 2026-09-28) — FP4 speed, but $281/GB |
| Which runs a 27B at Q4? | Both fit. 5090 is dramatically faster (FP4); 3090 is a quarter of the price |
| Which runs a 70B at Q4? | Neither single card — 70B Q4 needs ~48GB. Two 3090s or one A6000 48GB |
| Check the numbers | Compare them · Value index · Matrix |
What the community data says
DiggTop tracks attributed, methodology-linked runs. As of 2026-09-05:
| Card | Community runs | Average tok/s | Best single-stream tok/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 5090 32GB | 23 | 177.3 | 446.7 (NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B @ NVFP4) |
| RTX 3090 24GB | 18 | 174.1 | 709.5 (LFM2.5-1.2B @ Q4_K_M) |
Two caveats before you read the table. Both ceilings are small-model rows, so the headline gap (~3×) is about memory bandwidth, not about the models you probably care about. On the same model — Qwen3.8-27B, sourced rows only — the 5090's best is 435.1 tok/s against the 3090's 164.6 tok/s, a 2.6× gap, and the 3090's average on that model (100.1 across 7 rows) is dragged down by long-context runs at Q4. Second, the 5090's fastest 27B row uses NVFP4, Blackwell's native 4-bit format that Ampere simply does not have.
The 5090 row above is dominated by Blackwell-era runs (NVFP4/FP8). The 3090 has no FP4 path — its best quant is GGUF Q4_K_M or IQ4_XS.
VRAM math: 32GB vs 24GB
Local inference is decided by one number: does the model fit in VRAM, with room for KV cache and context?
| Model class | Q4 size (approx) | RTX 5090 (32GB) | RTX 3090 (24GB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7B–9B | 5–7GB | Easy | Easy |
| 27B (Qwen3.8-27B class) | ~17–20GB | Easy, FP4 fast | Fits, tight with long context |
| 35B MoE (A3B active) | ~20GB | Easy | Fits |
| 70B | ~40–48GB | Does not fit | Does not fit |
For 70B-class models the answer is the same on both cards: you need 48GB. That means a pair of used 3090s ($2,000–2,600), a used A6000 48GB ($2,200–2,800), or the new RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell if you have the budget. See our 70B on two used 3090s guide.
The FP4 lever (5090 only)
NVIDIA moved 4-bit math into hardware with Blackwell. On a 5090, a 27B model at NVFP4 has roughly half the VRAM footprint of FP16 and runs on tensor cores built for it — that is why the fastest sourced 27B row on our board is 435.1 tok/s on a 5090 (IQ4_XS, 131K context). A faster 4,546.8 tok/s NVFP4/sglang row exists in the database but is still partial, so it is not a board result.
The 3090 gets no such help: everything above 8-bit runs through GGUF K-quants or IQ quants on CUDA cores. Efficient, proven, community-standard — but the 5090's 4-bit ceiling is in a different league for models that fit its 32GB.
Price and value
| Metric | RTX 5090 (new) | RTX 3090 (used) |
|---|---|---|
| Street price (2026-09-28 snapshot) | ~$9,000 | ~$1,300 |
| VRAM | 32GB | 24GB |
| $ per GB | $156 | $44 |
US retail stock of the 5090 has been thin enough that street prices roughly doubled between our 09-10 and 09-28 snapshots: $4,899.99 to $9,000 (about +350% over its $1,999 MSRP). The used 3090 moved the same way, from ~$1,050 to $1,300. At these numbers the used 3090 still buys about 5× the VRAM per dollar — see the full ranking on the value index.
Verdict
- Budget / value / 70B plans: used RTX 3090 — and consider two of them for 70B Q4.
- New build, 27B-and-under with maximum speed: RTX 5090, only if the $156/GB premium is acceptable. NVFP4 is the reason to pay it.
- 70B on a single card: neither. Budget for 48GB (used A6000 or dual 3090).
- Intel/AMD alternative: Arc Pro B60 24GB ($599, $25/GB) is the cheapest 24GB card tracked — no FP4, but unbeatable VRAM per dollar.
Sources
- DiggTop sourced runs: benchmarks board · head-to-head · value index
- Current prices: our 2026-09-28 snapshot ($9,000 new 5090, $1,300 used 3090)
- 5090 street-price context (TechSpot, Aug 2026, superseded by the snapshot above): 199it summary
- Used 3090 market history: Howard Resource Group
- A6000 used $2,200–2,800 / new ~$4,650: SpecPicks
- Arc Pro B60 24GB at $599 US retail: Chiphell
FAQ
Used 3090 or new 5090 for local LLMs?
Depends on your target models. The 3090: 24 GB around $1,300 used (2026-09-28 snapshot) — still the best $/GB we track and the default value pick. The 5090: 32 GB plus NVFP4, which opens model classes a 3090 cannot load, at roughly 7× the card price. For 70B-class models, neither is enough — budget 48 GB instead.
What does the community benchmark data show?
On shared models the 5090 wins tok/s (newer architecture, faster memory, NVFP4 on supported models), while the used 3090 wins on cost by a wide margin — about 5× the VRAM per dollar at the 2026-09-28 snapshot. The head-to-head page shows the sourced per-model numbers.
Is 32 GB a real step up from 24 GB?
Yes, but not for 70B: it fits 27 B-class models at Q4 with long-context headroom, and NVFP4 pulls in some MoE models the 3090 cannot load. A 70B does not fit on either card — that is a 48 GB decision (used A6000, dual 3090, or RTX PRO 6000).
Does buying a 3090 now make sense if I plan to upgrade?
Yes. PCIe is stable, the 3090 can become the second GPU in a 70B build later, and it resells well. If your budget is tight, buy the 24 GB card now and treat the 48 GB step as a separate, later decision — that is the path the buying guide recommends.
Prices are weekly-snapshot items. Re-check prices before buying.