Intel Arc Pro B70 vs Radeon AI Pro R9700
Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.
Intel Arc Pro B7018 sourced runs · best 283.1 tok/s
Radeon AI Pro R970014 verified runs · best 969.4 tok/s
Specs and evidence
| Intel Arc Pro B70 | Radeon AI Pro R9700 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Sourced runs on the board | 18 | 14 |
| Models measured | 16 | 14 |
| Best output tok/s | 283.1 tok/s | 969.4 tok/s |
| Highest measured peak VRAM | 23.2 GB | 92.2 GB |
| Street price (latest snapshot) | $1,300 | — |
Head-to-head
On the 4 models measured on both cards, Intel Arc Pro B70 leads on 0, Radeon AI Pro R9700 on 4. The widest gap is on Muse-Glimmer-30B: Intel Arc Pro B70 29.2 tok/s vs Radeon AI Pro R9700 134.6 tok/s (Radeon AI Pro R9700 361% faster).
The measured matrix
| Model | Intel Arc Pro B70 | Radeon AI Pro R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | 248.3 | 969.4 |
| Qwen3.5-0.8B | — | 554.5 |
| LFM2.5-230M | — | 520.0 |
| LFM2.5-350M | — | 466.0 |
| Qwen3.5-27B | — | 286.6 |
| Laguna-XS-2.1 | 283.1 | — |
| LFM2.5-8B-A1B | — | 241.1 |
| Ornith-1.0-35B-B70-Turbo | 224.9 | — |
| Nex-N2-mini-B70-Turbo | 224.3 | — |
| SIQ-1-35B-B70-Turbo | 223.7 | — |
| Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-B70-Turbo | 209.0 | — |
| NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B | 186.6 | — |
| gemma-4-E2B-it | — | 169.7 |
| gemma-4-E4B-it | — | 137.0 |
| Muse-Glimmer-30B | 29.2 | 134.6 |
| LFM2.5-2.6B | 132.4 | — |
| Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | 131.5 | — |
| Qwen3.8-27B | 27.8 | 64.3 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | — | 59.4 |
| Gemma4-26B-A4B-QAT-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Balanced-MTP | 58.4 | — |
| Qwen 3.8 Flash-Next Base | — | 57.0 |
| Ornith-1.5-9B | 49.6 | — |
| Qwen3.6-27B-MTP | 36.0 | — |
| ThinkingCap-Qwen3.6-27B | 27.9 | — |
| Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 24.0 | 25.6 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | — | 17.4 |