DiggTop ⌕

RTX 5090 vs Tesla V100 x4

Pick a different pair →

Best sourced output tok/s per model (single-stream generation) — engine and version, quantization, context and a source link on every row. Hover a value for the quant.

RTX 509023 sourced runs · best 446.7 tok/s
Tesla V100 x41 verified run · best 391.0 tok/s

Specs and evidence

RTX 5090Tesla V100 x4
VRAM32 GB16 GB
Sourced runs on the board231
Models measured161
Best output tok/s446.7 tok/s391.0 tok/s
Highest measured peak VRAM31.3 GB61.0 GB
Street price (latest snapshot)——

Sourced rows only. Peak VRAM is recorded by the person who ran the benchmark, so it is a floor for what the card can hold, not a specification. Price snapshots.

Head-to-head

Only one model has been measured on both cards (Qwen3.8-27B). On that single data point RTX 5090 records 435.1 tok/s and Tesla V100 x4 records 391.0 tok/s — treat it as one data point, not a ranking.

The measured matrix

ModelRTX 5090Tesla V100 x4
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B446.7 NVFP4—
Qwen3.8-27B435.1 IQ4_XS391.0 NVFP4
Ornith-1.0-35B-PrismaAURA-4.75bit-vllm-MTP283.1 NVFP4—
Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct280.8 IQ4_XS—
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B258.8 NVFP4—
North-Mini-Code-1.0258.4 UD-Q6_K_XL—
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-MTP222.9 Unsloth-Dynamic-IQ4_XS—
Laguna-XS-2.1216.7 NVFP4—
KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev-AWQ-W4A16-ASYM201.2 W4A16—
Ornith-1.0-35B196.6 AWQ—
Muse-Glimmer-30B124.8 NVFP4—
Qwen3.6-27B120.9 NVFP4—
Huihui-Qwen3.8-27B-abliterated117.7 NVFP4—
Qwen3.8-27B-5090-goldilocks93.5 Q6_K—
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP28.3 Q5_K_M—
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-073126.4 MXFP4—

Head-to-head (models tested on both): RTX 5090 1 · Tesla V100 x4 0 · tied 0 · data as of Oct 17, 2026. Full rules: methodology.

Related reading: RTX 5090 vs 3090 · quantization · Value index · Full board

↑